Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 07:47:20 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@math.missouri.edu> Cc: "\[LoN\]Kamikaze" <LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de>, Pav Lucistnik <pav@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Time to abandon recursive pulling of dependencies? Message-ID: <20070518074720.ctp66d8so4g4gkgg@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <464CC1FE.5060706@math.missouri.edu> References: <464597C6.3030406@gmx.de> <20070512174011.GA22526@xor.obsecurity.org> <4645FF71.60100@gmx.de> <20070512175824.GA23103@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070512133054.B5588@math.missouri.edu> <4646193E.5040503@gmx.de> <464665D5.1090509@math.missouri.edu> <464676CC.2000203@math.missouri.edu> <46469BF5.9030603@math.missouri.edu> <1179058696.13237.3.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <20070513101332.L82202@math.missouri.edu> <46479215.1080401@math.missouri.edu> <4647C4FB.9050607@math.missouri.edu> <4647F182.6000402@gmx.de> <46487491.6020806@math.missouri.edu> <46488168.3030300@math.missouri.edu> <464B155A.1080105@math.missouri.edu> <464B7144.2000600@math.missouri.edu> <20070517185207.27c3faeb@deskjail> <464C924C.5010001@math.missouri.edu> <464CC1FE.5060706@math.missouri.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@math.missouri.edu> (from =20
Thu, 17 May 2007 15:58:38 -0500):
> Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>>> Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@math.missouri.edu> (Wed, =20
>>> 16 May 2007 16:01:56 -0500):
>>>
>>>
>>>> If I get some positive feedback on this one, I'll submit a PR. =20
>>>> You can try it out by typing "make actual-package-depends" as =20
>>>> opposed to "make package-depends."
>>>>
>>>
>>> Did you my chance also had a look how to speed up ALL-DEPENDS-LIST? It
>>> is used in clean-depends. And on my system it is slow (nearly 6 minutes
>>> for gnome2) too. As portupgrade cleans before and after updating a
>>> port, optimizing this may also be beneficial.
>>>
>>> Maybe first trying to construct all dependencies of the installed ports
>>> like in actual-package-depends and then the remaining ones like it is
>>> done currently...
>>>
>>> Bye,
>>> Alexander.
>>>
>>
>> I don't use "make clean" preferring a variant of "find /usr/ports =20
>> -name work -exec rm -rf {} \;".
>
> I just looked at it. I really don't think it is worth the big effort
> that we put into registering ports, because a make clean only happens
> once or twice, unlike registering of the port which happens for every
> single dependency.
"make install clean" is recommended to install a port. So it =20
contributes to the time the user sees.
> I think it would be better to modify portupgrade to use find to delete
> all the work in all the ports.
It is not allowed to delete all ports. What if I do a make in a =20
orthogonal port? It has to d o a make all-depends-list and clean the =20
ports in there, but that's what make clean does.
Bye,
Alexander.
--=20
It is when I struggle to be brief that I become obscure.
=09=09-- Quintus Horatius Flaccus (Horace)
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070518074720.ctp66d8so4g4gkgg>