Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1998 14:06:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom <tom@sdf.com> To: ymc@eecs.umich.edu, squid-dev@nlanr.net Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD parsing in Squid. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.980416140457.8955A-100000@misery.sdf.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.980417071515.19363X-100000@ns.hilink.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 17 Apr 1998, Daniel O'Callaghan wrote: > Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1998 16:58:08 -0400 (EDT) > From: Yee Man Chan <ymc@eecs.umich.edu> > To: Squid Developers' E-mail Group <squid-dev@nlanr.net> > Subject: FreeBSD parsing > Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1998 13:58:37 -0700 (PDT) > Resent-From: squid-dev@nlanr.net > > Hi, > > I run squid 1.1.20 at FreeBSD 4.4. According to the response time return What is "FreeBSD 4.4"? > from client, it is TEN TIMES SLOWER than I run it at SunOS v5. When I > compare the result from gprof, I find that squid spent considerably amount > of time (22.9%) in parseIntegerValue, decode_addr, aclParseIpData, > safe_inet_addr, storeDirClean, urlParse, parseHttpRequest and sscanf at > FreeBSD while only 3.7% of time spent in the same trace of code. Can > anyone tell me why? > > Thanks. > Yee Man Chan Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.980416140457.8955A-100000>