From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 20:11:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8CCF16A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:11:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wolfgang@saturn.lyxys.ka.sub.org) Received: from saturn.lyxys.ka.sub.org (saturn.lyxys.ka.sub.org [217.29.35.151]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0E343D45 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:11:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wolfgang@saturn.lyxys.ka.sub.org) Received: from saturn.lyxys.ka.sub.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.lyxys.ka.sub.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1IKBB7a079574 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:11:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wolfgang@saturn.lyxys.ka.sub.org) Received: (from wolfgang@localhost) by saturn.lyxys.ka.sub.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1IKBB7a079573 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:11:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wolfgang) From: Wolfgang Zenker Message-Id: <200602182011.k1IKBB7a079573@saturn.lyxys.ka.sub.org> In-Reply-To: <1140292322.11473.10.camel@honker.internal.dcrosstech.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:11:11 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender is SPF-compliant, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (saturn.lyxys.ka.sub.org [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:11:11 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: high interrupt load under 6.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:11:22 -0000 Hi, > I have a 486DX50 firewall that has been serving me well for a number of > years. I recently upgraded it fro 5.4 to 6.0 and performance plumeted > rather drastically (about 40%). I would like to fix it. What I have > noticed is that even when sitting idle the system spends ~20% of its > time in interrupt. Below I have included dmesg, kernel config, and > vmstat -i information. > [..] > interrupt total rate > irq0: clk 203894894 1000 a clock rate of 1000 Hz is probably to high for a 486 class cpu. You should add "options HZ=100" to your kernel config to get back to the 100 Hz that where default before 6.0 Wolfgang