From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 28 17:49:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D992DA for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 17:49:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9E08FC0C for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 17:49:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qASHnihg067470; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:49:44 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id qASHni5f067467; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:49:44 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:49:44 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: mike miskulin Subject: Re: i386 vs amd64 In-Reply-To: <20121128123623.4A29.AA011270@yahoo.com> Message-ID: References: <20121128123623.4A29.AA011270@yahoo.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:49:44 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 17:49:46 -0000 On Wed, 28 Nov 2012, mike miskulin wrote: > About to build a replacement system for an older i386 setup. A few > years ago I had tried the amd64 port on it and found it was frustrating > as things that just worked on i386 did not on amd64. IIRC ports were > large annoyance too. > > Now I have a new system with 8GB, etc,etc and wonder if I am best off to > stick with i386 and PAE or is the amd64 version finally on a par or > close enough that I would not likely have many issues like in the past? > > Thanks for your thoughts/(recent) experiences. Do you use emulators/wine? If not, switch to amd64. In fact, even if you do, switch to amd64 to use that 8G of memory. Building 32-bit Wine on amd64 is a hassle, but packages are available and I think there is a 64-bit port on the way.