From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 1 00:50:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F74716A400; Tue, 1 May 2007 00:50:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6D813C465; Tue, 1 May 2007 00:50:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0AA1A4DBA; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:50:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 444E3513AD; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:50:07 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:50:07 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Andrey Chernov , Kris Kennaway , src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070501005007.GA70549@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200704301227.l3UCRwao077864@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070430191144.GA66695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070430191555.GB87375@nagual.pp.ru> <20070430195237.GA67426@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070501001627.GA804@nagual.pp.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070501001627.GA804@nagual.pp.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/libexec/pppoed pppoed.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 00:50:08 -0000 On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 04:16:27AM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 03:52:37PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 11:15:55PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 03:11:45PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > What impact is this going to have on ports? Surely there are lots of > > > > them that use putenv(). > > > > > > If they work under Linux, they already forced to do the right thing. Only > > > those which are BSD-only may fail. > > > > > > > Can I assume you're interested in fixing them? > > > > > > Yes. > > > > Great, thanks! > > Kris, could you please run test build for ports with all changes up to > sys/param.h in? I want to see how many ports will failed if any. > Personally me run lots of ports of my machine and didn't notice any bad > side effect yet. Will do. Kris