From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 17 02:53:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CC59106564A for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 02:53:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf2006a@yahoo.com) Received: from web39101.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web39101.mail.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.86.252]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1693E8FC1D for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 02:53:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf2006a@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 45141 invoked by uid 60001); 17 Nov 2008 02:26:35 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=YrEtLCZ4MApzUkS9KW1fH5MCxj/4YuG8H7ui6axqp3Wa2qetRqKyWWPisqka9WSqxG0GPMra3E/Ge+djCWbQ2dKVePOVja8jej4fnbxMEBJtmkxJ12MoXbqYuVJJ7a6TYtOADir37UzaaWMAxO021p7CnLKB7Wp/iqKdgAz3sCg=; X-YMail-OSG: HTuU6U4VM1lBO9M4hQL8cV1iRjAgpLBKwTB7UuGuM3VMa1dPg7jofyKS9UgidoRrxU6zOkr6C9SO78e5I2MSrHmPe0W_QQGorQMbqn.hZPJ3j_LLMQp4xrBZ6daTRKwvpZcBgH5hZoCuI6SGjMPhdW7pVfbddSS2g55E0SdPARtplbxTZ54koPBbIw-- Received: from [87.118.101.102] by web39101.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:26:34 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.260.1 Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:26:34 -0800 (PST) From: bf To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, pyunyh@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <957411.42240.qm@web39101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: Subject: Re: Realtek 8139 with rl(4) driver -> Poor performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bf2006a@yahoo.com List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 02:53:17 -0000 > There was a bus_dma(9) bug in rl(4) and it was fixed in HEAD. > How about rl(4) in HEAD? I guess it would build with minor > modification. > > -- > Regards, > Pyun YongHyeon I meant to ask about this: I think you are referring to r184240-3 committed around Oct. 25, partly in response to PR kern/128143, right? Is there any plan to merge these changes to RELENG_7, either before or after the release of 7.1? Thanks, b.