From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 19 14:28:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0541106566B; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 14:28:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mdf356@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C41AC8FC1B; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 14:28:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so5940790wyf.13 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 07:28:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=5VbRzvwAqc4wDCyk/STFdPQVsebEdp7b2Vi6k8QQLHg=; b=QRsMCH+rK099Ap1wA97YT8qCzQkt6KGTfikVsnuBEYPrslCL0kvp6iUotwIbcKUdKJ bf/3Hhbt4Vw+/UaYxWovDo8uWqAvXVk6xX3GXlVWsZBRrMTXHSZ1PwgwdYGyZkem8SFG HXThPIL7/+BN6tdI/Se9/UArJGkSXua4rE9i8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=mwE3GUow10BGeha+TrTGwq1fev5IhtQUQopIqXcKC6svBXbRHf8cM82bt8A7BD8qhS sWIoZdx+pFapYKSHewrN38qFZnsvFelcRIxIRh7tM4YuYMsnV8e9eTCRx0DMEgr2SrMF TQyG5xJ9rNlZtXzstlQSkfqYFdoHbGAz6yQcM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.245.6 with SMTP id n6mr1354655wer.40.1303223303658; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 07:28:23 -0700 (PDT) Sender: mdf356@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.9.67 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 07:28:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201104190840.29535.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <201104172103.p3HL3Ntb049564@svn.freebsd.org> <4DAC8060.2070002@FreeBSD.org> <92422863-8655-4FDE-A1E9-5EE1F46DA5BC@bsdimp.com> <201104190840.29535.jhb@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 07:28:23 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: MaX_zQOF9H4Sf3jFBoWugWiTXK8 Message-ID: From: mdf@FreeBSD.org To: John Baldwin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r220755 - in head: . contrib/gcc/doc contrib/gcc/objc contrib/libobjc etc/mtree gnu/lib gnu/lib/libobjc gnu/usr.bin/cc gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1obj gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools gnu/usr.bin/cc/doc s... X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 14:28:25 -0000 Trimming since I have a mostly-unrelated question... On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 5:40 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday, April 18, 2011 3:59:45 pm Warner Losh wrote: >> In this case, there was a new kernel thing just after, so it turned out OK. >> But let's not gratuitously bump the version since the granularity we have >> already allows the ports to make good choices on when to leave something in or >> out. > > Except that that directly contradicts our previously established policy that > these version bumps are cheap and that we should do more of them (this came up > a few years ago when we changed the policy so that the new "stable" branch > after a release starts at N + 500 (e.g. 802500) rather than N + 100 to give > more room for version bumps on current). I thought I remembered reading (within the past 2 years) that __FreeBSD_version should not be incremented more than once a day, since there was a limit of 100 before the version minor number was affected. Did I get the polarity backwards and that was the old policy? Thanks, matthew