From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 08:55:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50EBB1065672 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 08:55:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC0DB8FC08 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 08:55:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywa17 with SMTP id 17so1666975ywa.13 for ; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 01:55:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=kBspfhlicyI680A0BY/oRXKtdKHg5NWLZ0oB/Sgf/UQ=; b=bOhmiQhkcPCCWoNT7isbaM1yPKLk8M/gcrjF8JhdIDWbfniecWyz28dzV1nlEkqBWh w7dpIZomWSk97/SdSdQbKq12rJ2EktG/7+62cFowDCmgE/0REVONRDNlJYwcT9R2avTe S9XAIk+5enw6MhS3z1wa/VNhoqcPZ+Ht/wzzk= Received: by 10.231.26.68 with SMTP id d4mr1866132ibc.66.1315558502095; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 01:55:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.61.148 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 01:54:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110909073305.Horde.oi-EGaQd9PdOaaURAsTRVJk@avocado.salatschuessel.net> References: <20110908221356.Horde.MFEsZ6Qd9PdOaSIEaid2X_A@avocado.salatschuessel.net> <4E692F87.5010708@sentex.net> <20110909073305.Horde.oi-EGaQd9PdOaaURAsTRVJk@avocado.salatschuessel.net> From: Chris Rees Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:54:32 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: iSkbQPk_77ziCF4P1h5FsxiSkGg Message-ID: To: Oliver Lehmann , mux@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: cvsup broken on amd64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 08:55:03 -0000 On 9 September 2011 06:33, Oliver Lehmann wrote: > > Mike Tancsa wrote: > >> Just curious as to why you need cvsup and not instead use csup that is >> in the base ? > > I got used to it in the past 12 years? But this is not realy the question. > If it is "BROKEN" it should be marked as BROKEN or there should be a > statement that it will not work with FreeBSD 9 on at least amd64 or we > will have other users complaining about the same at least when > 9.0 RELEASE is out - right? The cvsup port is normally used now only for cvsupd, for which there is no csupd analog. As far as I know, and perhaps mux (CC'd) could confirm every feature present in cvsup is present in csup-- and it's a fair amount faster too. Of course, cvsup could probably do with fixing, but for now csup is literally a drop-in replacement; it'll read all your supfiles too. Chris