From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 10 13:50:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B761065686 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:50:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CAD8FC16 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:50:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o2ADo919063347 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:50:09 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o2ADo9Mb063346; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:50:09 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:50:09 GMT Message-Id: <201003101350.o2ADo9Mb063346@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org From: John Baldwin Cc: Subject: Re: amd64/144503: [boot] 8.0-RELEASE does not boot on DL585 [regression] X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: John Baldwin List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:50:10 -0000 The following reply was made to PR amd64/144503; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Baldwin To: Gunther Schadow Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd64/144503: [boot] 8.0-RELEASE does not boot on DL585 [regression] Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:43:40 -0500 On Tuesday 09 March 2010 11:41:42 pm Gunther Schadow wrote: > Thanks for looking into this. > > If I set hw.pci.mcfg=0 it does not help at all. > > If I also try do disable acpi and apic it makes no difference. > Always stuck at the same point: > > pci0: on pcib0 > > The upshot is that it reminds me of the good old days of trying > to install 386/bsd 0.0 or netbsd on a VAX :) Do you get any other printfs' beyond this line with boot -v or does boot -v die sooner? -- John Baldwin