Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:07:44 -0500
From:      Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com>
To:        Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: isofs/cd9660 -> relocate to fs/isofs/cd9660?
Message-ID:  <451C8E00.500@centtech.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060928082651.b6xp2ayu9wg40wok@webmail.leidinger.net>
References:  <451ADC21.50206@centtech.com> <451AE27F.3010506@samsco.org>	<200609271727.29775.jhb@freebsd.org> <20060928082651.b6xp2ayu9wg40wok@webmail.leidinger.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/28/06 01:26, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> (from Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:27:29 -0400):
> 
>> We've actually moved most of the filesystems into sys/fs in the past.  Only
>> cd9660, nfs, and ufs are in the top-level.  I'd still say leave nfs and ufs
>> alone, but sys/isofs/cd9660 -> sys/fs/cd9660 (I wouldn't keep the extra isofs
>> directory) probably wouldn't be but so painful at this point.
> 
> I expect a lot of moves when we switch to a VCS where moves are  
> cheap... but on the other hand, maybe this is another bikeshed.
> 
> Bye,
> Alexander.
> 


When is that supposed to happen?


Eric


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Anderson        Sr. Systems Administrator        Centaur Technology
Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't.
------------------------------------------------------------------------



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?451C8E00.500>