Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 22 Aug 2022 01:55:19 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 265966] Security/Liblurch fails to build (New Port)
Message-ID:  <bug-265966-7788-h3Fs9HaV95@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-265966-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-265966-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D265966

Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|New                         |Closed
         Resolution|---                         |Not A Bug
                 CC|                            |lwhsu@FreeBSD.org

--- Comment #1 from Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Michael A. Oshin from comment #0)
Thanks for working on making a new port!

I create a pull request for you:
https://github.com/micadeyeye/freebsd-ports/pull/1 and hope it help.

You don't really need gpg verifying stuff in the port because this can be d=
one
once when you creating or updating the port, for others the checksum in
distinfo you provided should be fine.

I also removed some unnecessary parts from the Makefile. Also please note t=
hat=20
lurch is 0.7.0 now, you may want to use the latest version.

BTW, the better place to discuss the porting questions would be freebsd-por=
ts
mailing list: https://lists.freebsd.org/subscription/freebsd-ports

Let's move the further discussion there. Close the PR for now. Please open a
new ticket or reopen this one and change the subject when the port is ready=
 to
be tested.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-265966-7788-h3Fs9HaV95>