From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct  1 10:43:43 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD435B8F
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed,  1 Oct 2014 10:43:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4DBCE72
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed,  1 Oct 2014 10:43:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s91AhhDR042643
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 10:43:43 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 192907] www/fcgiwrap: Update 1.1.0-5
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 10:43:43 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: freebsd@skysmurf.nl
X-Bugzilla-Status: Patch Ready
X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-192907-13-IKZYwuTj0p@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-192907-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-192907-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 10:43:44 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192907

--- Comment #15 from A.J. "Fonz" van Werven <freebsd@skysmurf.nl> ---
The summary/title has never been right in the first place and doesn't reflect
what the submitter's patch does either. Anyway, as far as I can see, I can't
change the summary/title myself. That's probably committer's prerogative. But
if you need a suggestion, I'd say something like:

"Improved handling of binary stripping and addition of a new command line
option that restricts what may be run"

ought to cover it nicely. Or, if you like it shorter, replace the second part
with simply "addition of a new feature".

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.