From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Nov 18 01:38:19 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id BAA06309 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 18 Nov 1995 01:38:19 -0800 Received: from remington.mt.cs.keio.ac.jp (remington.mt.cs.keio.ac.jp [131.113.82.33]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id BAA06266 for ; Sat, 18 Nov 1995 01:38:07 -0800 Received: (from hosokawa@localhost) by remington.mt.cs.keio.ac.jp (8.6.12+2.4W/3.4Wbeta3) id SAA25406; Sat, 18 Nov 1995 18:37:27 +0900 Date: Sat, 18 Nov 1995 18:37:27 +0900 Message-Id: <199511180937.SAA25406@remington.mt.cs.keio.ac.jp> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: DELAY's in syscons From: hosokawa@mt.cs.keio.ac.jp (HOSOKAWA Tatsumi) X-Mailer: mnews [version 1.18PL3] 1994-08/01(Mon) Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Hmm.. Does anyone remember that the conclusion of last thread about the DELAY's in syscons? I said a few months ago that the DELAY's of syscons may be insufficient for some combinations of fast machine like Pentium over 100MHz and slow keyboards. I heard that some people has the same problem and I told them to increase all the DELAY's of syscons ten times. And they reported me that this problem never happen. I've not tested -cuurent on such machine yet, so I don't know whether this problem still remains in -current. Thanks. -- HOSOKAWA, Tatsumi E-mail: hosokawa@mt.cs.keio.ac.jp WWW homepage: http://www.mt.cs.keio.ac.jp/person/hosokawa.html Department of Computer Science, Keio University, Yokohama, Japan