From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Feb 22 12:45:28 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA16826
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 22 Feb 1996 12:45:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tfs.com (tfs.com [140.145.250.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA16821
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 22 Feb 1996 12:45:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by tfs.com (smail3.1.28.1) 
Message-Id: <m0tphtG-0003w8C@TFS.COM>
From: julian@TFS.COM (Julian Elischer)
Subject: Re: Linux/FreeBSD NFS performance.
To: graichen@omega.physik.fu-berlin.de (Thomas Graichen)
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 12:45:26 -0800 (PST)
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <4giarf$1u7@prospero.physik.fu-berlin.de> from "Thomas Graichen" at Feb 22, 96 05:58:07 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> :                                 machine -> server   server -> machine
> : deimos   (i486DX2-66, linux):   654 s   30.8 kb/s   76 s   265.5 kb/s
> : ariel    (pentium 100, linux):  646 s   31.2 kb/s   76 s   265.5 kb/s
> : phobos   (pentium 90, FreeBSD): 107 s  188.6 kb/s   32 s   630.5 kb/s
> : neptunus (sparc, SunOS):        120 s  168.1 kb/s   20 s  1008.8 kb/s
> 
> can you please do the same test on a linux 1.3.68+ kernel - because someone
> mentioned they speeded up the nfs code in that version - i would be interested
> in how much they speeded them up
then I guess we should try -current as well :)
> 
julian