From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 27 06:50:35 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E203637B401; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 06:50:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (xorpc.icir.org [192.150.187.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5412443F3F; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 06:50:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h2REoZAq004225; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 06:50:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id h2REoYDx004224; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 06:50:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo) Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 06:50:34 -0800 From: Luigi Rizzo To: Martin Blapp Message-ID: <20030327065034.A4190@xorpc.icir.org> References: <200303270941.h2R9fi0x033040@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030327140029.W74303@cvs.imp.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030327140029.W74303@cvs.imp.ch>; from mb@imp.ch on Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 02:06:09PM +0100 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-32.5 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Martin Blapp cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice and JDK's (was cvs commit: ports/editors/openoffice-devel Makefile) X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:50:37 -0000 does this mean that we can distribute the OO package from the freebsd sites ? As you know it is a big pita to build openoffice so having the pre-built package would be a big win. cheers luigi On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 02:06:09PM +0100, Martin Blapp wrote: > > Hi all, > > After many emails I got in private about the jdk dependence of > OpenOffice I need to make some things more clear I guess :-) > > - OpenOffice1.0x and OpenOffice1.1 havily use javac and other java binarys. > - OpenOffice 1.1 links against the javaruntimelib > - OpenOffice needs ANT to build, which depends itself on a JDK > - It's not possible to BUILD OpenOffice without a JDK. > - It's possible to RUN OpenOffice without a JDK. > > Martin > > > OOo1.1 seems to link against a lib in the jdk. OOo will still run > > without this library, but for compile it is definitly needed. Remove > > the linux jdk dependency and use again our native one.