Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 23:23:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com, marcus@marcuscom.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mozilla busted? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0209192322220.16925-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20020919.220431.18410376.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10209192356140.2162-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> > Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> writes: > : On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : I think it does since it's a kernel ABI breakage in ucontext_t's > : and sigreturn(). I think we either need to reformat the ucontext_t > : in some way that is compatible with the old format, or make a > : new sigreturn() using the current one for compatibility. It's > : a shame 'cause it's only broken for i386, not the other archs. > > I think that would be an excellent idea. I think that there are > enough libc_r applications for 4.x that we need to retain binary > compatibility at this level. Otherwise we're going to be raked over > the coals. That's the plan... uh, the change, not the hot coals. > > Warner > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0209192322220.16925-100000>