From owner-freebsd-java Wed Sep 9 10:00:02 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA11832 for freebsd-java-outgoing; Wed, 9 Sep 1998 10:00:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pobox.com (port33.prairietech.net [208.141.230.110]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA11789 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 1998 09:59:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from alk@pobox.com) Received: (from alk@localhost) by pobox.com (8.8.8/8.7.3) id MAA15384; Wed, 9 Sep 1998 12:02:34 -0500 (CDT) From: Tony Kimball MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1998 12:02:34 -0500 (CDT) X-Face: O9M"E%K;(f-Go/XDxL+pCxI5*gr[=FN@Y`cl1.Tn Reply-To: alk@pobox.com To: gback@cs.utah.edu Cc: swindellsr@genrad.co.uk, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Daemonising a Java Process: Possible? References: <199809090938.CAA12739@hub.freebsd.org> <199809091527.JAA13391@sal.cs.utah.edu> X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: <13814.45985.615741.660509@compound.east> Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Quoth Godmar Back on Wed, 9 September: : : On one hand, you're saying you want to avoid legal trouble because : the port might give away information about Sun's JVM internals. : On the other hand, you're intending to offer the source back to : Transvirtual. : It seems worthwhile to point out that compatibility changes to kaffe jit to conform to the public interface and changes to conform to non-public interfaces fall into different categories. Kaffe is untainted by license violation if the former are folded in, although no long truly "clean-room" if the author(s) are jdk licensees, but would be tainted (absent explicit permission from the jdk owner) by inclusion of the latter. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message