From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 03:32:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B59516A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 03:32:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0787543D3F for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 03:32:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id A67FD146F8; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 05:32:20 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 05:32:20 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: Where is FreeBSD going? X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 11:32:21 -0000 kris wrote: > [for a larger ports cluster] to be useful we'd either need a full > cluster of faster machines located somewhere, or to find time to > rewrite the build scripts to work efficiently with remote build > resources. While this particularly cool idea has occurred to me as well, the toughest problem might be ensuring that the build environments on the distributed machines are exactly in sync. mcl