From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jan 17 13: 9:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from xena.gsicomp.on.ca (cr677933-a.ktchnr1.on.wave.home.com [24.43.230.149]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB9A37B6E0 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 13:09:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from hermes (hermes.gsicomp.on.ca [192.168.0.18]) by xena.gsicomp.on.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA75230 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:08:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca) Message-ID: <008a01c080ca$1780ccc0$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> From: "Matthew Emmerton" To: Subject: Re: A Newer OpenSSL Port? [ updated ] Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:11:42 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > I'm running 4.1-REL, and am working on porting the SRP implementation from > Stanford. > > Their implementation of SRP relies on openssl-0.9.6. Digging deeper it only relies on 0.9.5, but all the documentation points to 0.9.6. This said, upgrading to 4.2-REL is an option, but I don't want to do that. Thus, for the 4.x systems that I have, what problems would arise from hacking the openssl port to allow installation of 0.9.5a or 0.9.6 over top of the openssl included with the base system? -- Matt Emmerton GSI Computer Services To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message