From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 10 08:24:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE29B1065670 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:24:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de) Received: from mrelay1.uni-hannover.de (mrelay1.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.106]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A2C8FC12 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:24:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.pmp.uni-hannover.de (www.pmp.uni-hannover.de [130.75.117.2]) by mrelay1.uni-hannover.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o1A8OCDS008495; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:24:13 +0100 Received: from pmp.uni-hannover.de (arc.pmp.uni-hannover.de [130.75.117.1]) by www.pmp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 45A3624; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:24:12 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:24:12 +0100 From: Gerrit =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=FChn?= To: Elliot Finley Message-Id: <20100210092412.5a06d98e.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> In-Reply-To: <54e63c321002091227w15657c54oeb2295efc4c43980@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100209150606.ddba52dc.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <54e63c321002091227w15657c54oeb2295efc4c43980@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Albert-Einstein-Institut (MPI =?ISO-8859-1?Q?f=FCr?= Gravitationsphysik & IGP =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Universit=E4t?= Hannover) X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.1 (GTK+ 2.18.4; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.5.9.388399, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2010.2.10.81225 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zpool vdev vs. glabel X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:24:15 -0000 On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 13:27:21 -0700 Elliot Finley wrote about Re: zpool vdev vs. glabel: EF> I ran into this same problem. you need to clean the beginning and end EF> of your disk off before glabeling and adding it to your pool. clean EF> with dd if=/dev/zero... Hm, I think I did that (at least for the beginning part). Maybe I was not quite clear what I did below: I removed and re-attached the *same* disk which was labelled with glabel and running fine brefore. The label was there when I inserted it back, but zfs went for the da device node anyway. If I see this problem again, I will try to wipe the complete disk before re-inserting it. cu Gerrit