From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 18 03:44:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5813106566C for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:44:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnemmi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f227.google.com (mail-fx0-f227.google.com [209.85.220.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757D28FC08 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:44:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm27 with SMTP id 27so784765fxm.3 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:44:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Q0VCfqryFmmpwB1Wl0phEx0hMxLKUGhLd0xzcL0Hayk=; b=AyYjDHy9pS+1QzASEvgiWaSHzW9C0qFDHGhsEyhZrQt1LBjWedw5FZmNn3yJIIPegU ttncafpUxmHkAFEFiNtPhwSeeeFC5/fmsajrL3E366xnircHy3ThUX3obE0XbxptN5OQ irXogOdSP1JESOM4hE13eo57eHQy2rORMa7IU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=LobD3FDdvZX0VvDcfvwrGHeEW6IWZJFvcrmL4ZJmbdk3gCjO5xbeMk8xawl+EKBqnM 7uqIy/ymuK7GExj+V4R8ZePnAKr63E3S7ymf2HwYSyBIMC8MrfJi5vebjqPPG8zcHNqb KPI9eKdbk0Rjx5yLfP0xWePoUnxnQkkE3iKEE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.81.8 with SMTP id i8mr4616227mul.80.1258515892192; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:44:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <200911172021.16848.gnemmi@gmail.com> <41D86F39-D98A-4195-8345-765E0F742FAE@wanderview.com> <19e9a5dc0911171614l42f4c90ci2abce9982727ef61@mail.gmail.com> <4B033E22.3060700@FreeBSD.org> <8727F2A4-B830-43EE-BB9B-A17798374C00@wanderview.com> <4B034899.9090408@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:44:52 -0300 Message-ID: <19e9a5dc0911171944q5d15dc96t83ecd53befb07621@mail.gmail.com> From: Gonzalo Nemmi To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: WITHOUT_MODULES, does it actually work? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:44:54 -0000 On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Ben Kelly wrote: > > On Nov 17, 2009, at 8:06 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > > > Ben Kelly wrote: > >> It seems there are some left over bits then. I have this in > /usr/src/sys/modules/Makefile: > >> > >> .for reject in ${WITHOUT_MODULES} > >> SUBDIR:= ${SUBDIR:N${reject}} > >> .endfor > > > > Well it seems my search was not exhaustive. > > > > My recommendation then would be to file a src PR so that someone can > > look into it. :) > > I've opened a doc PR for the bad example in the handbook and a conf PR for > the patch to make WITHOUT_MODULES work from the kernel config file using > makeoptions. I haven't gotten PR numbers back from the system yet. > > - Ben_______________________________________________ So, basically .. not only man make.conf and the handbook examples are wrong .. WITHOUT_MODULES doesn't actually work :s Thanks a lot for your research, testing, PR and patches Ben ! Please, should you be able to, I would like to know the PR number so I can follow it. Hope your patch makes it in and WITHOUT_MODULES works as expected :) Best Regards Gonzalo Nemmi