Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 13:25:11 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Subject: CSS 1.X vs. 2.X attributes Message-ID: <20051010102511.GC2617@flame.pc>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bearing in mind that:
* min-width is a CSS 2.X (but not CSS 1.X) attribute
* it may improve the resizing of our front page
* the following mini-quote from a discussion me and des@ took part in
# Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 13:21:17 +0300
# From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>
#
# On 2005-10-10 12:03, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no> wrote:
# >Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> writes:
# >> How about specifying a minimum of 765px and then a width of 75%?
# >>
# >> min-width: 765px;
# >> width: 75%;
# >>
# >> That should do the trick.
# >
# > Ah, I didn't know about min-width; it's not in CSS1.
#
# You're right, of course. It is part of CSS 2.X. I'm not sure what is
# the CSS standards level we want to be compatible with, so I'll have to
# ask the folks at freebsd-www about using min-width or other CSS 2.X
# attributes.
What is our current policy (assuming we actually _have_ one) about using
CSS 1.X vs. 2.X attributes in stylesheets for the web site?
- Giorgos
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051010102511.GC2617>