From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 5 22:50:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737FB106566B for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 22:50:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64B538FC14 for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 22:50:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p65Mo845049766 for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 22:50:08 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p65Mo8oT049765; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 22:50:08 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 22:50:08 GMT Message-Id: <201107052250.p65Mo8oT049765@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org From: Brendon Meyer Cc: Subject: Re: kern/156781: [zfs] zfs is losing the snapshot directory, X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Brendon Meyer List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 22:50:08 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/156781; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Brendon Meyer To: Nathan Bowyer Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/156781: [zfs] zfs is losing the snapshot directory, Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 08:23:32 +1000 On 05/07/2011, at 11:56 PM, Nathan Bowyer wrote: > I have had this occur on amd64 with 8.2-RELEASE. I also came to the = conclusion that it takes a reboot to fix the issue. > Is there any activity on this bug? Not sure to be honest. I'm going actually in the process of building a = new testing environment for a updated mail server and will probably be = able to give a more definitive answer a bit later (the build will be = done later this week and then I'll be letting my test scrips run mad on = it for a week or so). =20 The fact that you have had the same problems with AMD means that the = problem isn't SPARC specific. I am guessing that it is probably a = commit that was made between to the zfs or solaris code between Mon Feb = 28 16:07:24 EST 2011 and Sun Apr 24 21:28:12 EST 2011 (those are two = systems I have that are very similarly configured but the earlier one = doesn't have the problem whereas the later one does). =20 /BGM=