From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Jan  5 10:43:30 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA18329
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 10:43:30 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA18310
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 10:43:26 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1])
	by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA06089;
	Tue, 5 Jan 1999 10:42:47 -0800 (PST)
To: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>
cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>,
        Andrzej Bialecki <abial@nask.pl>
Subject: Re: /boot/boot.rc && /boot/rc.d 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 06 Jan 1999 03:18:40 +0900."
             <36925780.75AB6581@newsguy.com> 
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 10:42:46 -0800
Message-ID: <6086.915561766@zippy.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> I was thinking about possible on-comings "patches" in boot.rc
> (currently known as boot.conf :), when I realized that for
> third-party drivers or ports making use of loader it would better to
> source files from a boot/rc.d directory.
> 
> Is this already planned?

We hadn't really thought this far ahead, but I see no reason why
following such a "hook chain" couldn't be a part of the system.

- Jordan

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message