From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 20 21:54:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F14A016A400 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 21:54:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from rwcrmhc14.comcast.net (rwcrmhc14.comcast.net [204.127.192.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02FAC43D48 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 21:54:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [208.206.151.59] (host59.gtisd.com[208.206.151.59]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc14) with ESMTP id <20060320215437m1400s0bg8e>; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 21:54:37 +0000 Message-ID: <441F249D.4050107@computer.org> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:54:37 -0600 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <441EDD35.3080105@computer.org> <20060320185113.GA8370@britannica.bec.de> In-Reply-To: <20060320185113.GA8370@britannica.bec.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: repeatedly opening the same .so(s) is slow? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 21:54:48 -0000 joerg@britannica.bec.de wrote: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 10:49:57AM -0600, Eric Schuele wrote: >> I have a port (gnucash) which takes 3-4 minutes to open on a 2.6GHz >> machine. It used to take 15-20 seconds till all of the libtool changes. > > This sounds exactly like the problems I initially had with KDE on > DragonFly. You say 'initially'. Did you find a fix? > Check whether it is using libtool's dlopen wrapper, since it It has its own libguile-ltdl.so. I'm not sure of its function though as it can happily be replaced with the ligltdl.so, with no immediate bad side effects. > seems to believe that the system dlopen either can't support hard-coded > search paths (known bug in the last 1.5 version of libtool) or can't > trace dependency libs. > > Joerg > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Regards, Eric