From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 24 21:45:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6293F1065683 for ; Sat, 24 May 2008 21:45:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [91.103.162.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C028FC18 for ; Sat, 24 May 2008 21:45:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost.codelab.cz [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134D419E019; Sat, 24 May 2008 23:45:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (r5bb235.net.upc.cz [86.49.61.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0941B19E023; Sat, 24 May 2008 23:45:39 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <48388C96.1050807@quip.cz> Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 23:45:58 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: cz, cs, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" References: <4838851D.9010007@quip.cz> <20080524213123.E65662@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <20080524213123.E65662@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New wiki page - Jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 21:45:42 -0000 Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Sat, 24 May 2008, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > > Hi, > >> I just started with some informations on http://wiki.freebsd.org/Jails >> So let me know what you think about it and do not hesitate with more >> ideas. > > > Thanks for the summary. > > Just on a sidenote: most of the 'Future plans' will never happen as > part of jails but as part of a larger virtualization technique if they > are going to happen at all. > Basically virtualizing everything under the name of jails does ot make > a lot of sense. At one point you want a hypervisor and simply boot > different instances. Yes, I am aware of it. It is just a list of "known" feature requests. If you have some background knowledge of what and how is planned in FreeBSD for Jail or Vimage, please let me know and I can write some notes to each 'Future plan' item (someting like 'covered by Vimage' or 'will never appear in Jails' etc.) or you can do it yourself, if you have write access to the wiki page. Miroslav Lachman