From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 19 21:05:13 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6605D1065675
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 21:05:13 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ray@ddteam.net)
Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com
	[209.85.215.182])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF47D8FC08
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 21:05:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so2855388eyd.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:05:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.17.7 with SMTP id i7mr1116132eei.147.1319058311550;
	Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:05:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rnote.ddteam.net (20-13-133-95.pool.ukrtel.net. [95.133.13.20])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v3sm6021153eej.7.2011.10.19.14.05.09
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:04:57 +0300
From: Aleksandr Rybalko <ray@ddteam.net>
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Message-Id: <20111020000457.ad225dcc.ray@ddteam.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmonQymmupm=B6Rp-MckG-v+=CwrtqKagTDn-UymFHnMVcw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20111017194940.ed720115.ray@ddteam.net>
	<CAJ-VmomDTtnUROGbhDN9DDev0PWdt5HdbZifRvLC6ua8AC7+Fw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111018121540.a402040e.ray@dlink.ua>
	<CAJ-VmonQymmupm=B6Rp-MckG-v+=CwrtqKagTDn-UymFHnMVcw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.0 (GTK+ 2.24.5; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Aleksandr Rybalko <ray@dlink.ua>, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: SPI rework
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 21:05:13 -0000

On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:14:07 +0800
Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote:

> .. what's wrong with your first suggestion? I liked it. :)
> 
> 
> Adrian

Because we can't do duplex operations in that way. But if we use old
struct, we will be able send and receive in the same time. I don't know
if such device exists. But if we implement "SPI device" then we will be
able to communicate between two FreeBSD boxes in a duplex manner! :)


-- 
Aleksandr Rybalko <ray@ddteam.net>