Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 6 Sep 2006 01:09:13 -0700
From:      Peter Hessler <phessler@theapt.org>
To:        Timo Schoeler <timo.schoeler@riscworks.net>
Cc:        miros-discuss@mirbsd.org, misc@openbsd.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org, netbsd-users@netbsd.org
Subject:   Re: The future of NetBSD
Message-ID:  <20060906080923.58B2C39596@gir.theapt.org>
In-Reply-To: <44FE7D14.4060909@riscworks.net>
References:  <20060831110112.J82634@hub.org> <f34ca13c0608310843p4e28b57eoec2f60737c034ddb@mail.gmail.com> <20060831184715.B82634@hub.org> <44F7619B.8010609@evilkittens.org> <20060831192632.T82634@hub.org> <20060831225719.GG25515@ribeyre.gentiane.org> <20060831200228.B82634@hub.org> <20060831230642.GH25515@ribeyre.gentiane.org> <20060831201338.F82634@hub.org> <20060905070219.GC13764@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> <20060905141802.GB5021@peereboom.us> <64617.61.9.41.179.1157518242.squirrel@co-mail.ched.gov.ph> <44FE7D14.4060909@riscworks.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 09:47:32 +0200
Timo Schoeler <timo.schoeler@riscworks.net> wrote:

: > Hi All!
: > 
: > I agree totally with Mr. Peereboom. IMHO, BLOBS are not sustainable
: > in the long run. If a manufacturer decides to retire a particular
: > model (driver support included) while OS keeps on releasing newer
: > versions (which include changes in the design and/or how things are
: > implemented) one will be facing two scenarios: stasis or an
: > unstable system. Both I believe is distasteful.
: 
: definitely. but on the other hand there's 15 minutes of fame if you 
: support a device (using a blob) today -- as others won't support it.

If you want 15 minutes of fame, go rob a liquor store.


-- 
One thing the inventors can't seem to get the bugs out of
is fresh paint.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060906080923.58B2C39596>