From owner-cvs-sys  Wed Feb 22 14:52:41 1995
Return-Path: cvs-sys-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id OAA08021 for cvs-sys-outgoing; Wed, 22 Feb 1995 14:52:41 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id OAA08014; Wed, 22 Feb 1995 14:52:31 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.cdrom.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
To: se@mi.uni-koeln.de (Stefan Esser)
cc: davidg@root.com, CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com,
        cvs-sys@freefall.cdrom.com
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci ncr.c 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 22 Feb 95 19:56:23 +0100."
             <199502221856.AA06334@ParC04.MI.Uni-Koeln.DE> 
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 1995 14:52:25 -0800
Message-ID: <8011.793493545@freefall.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freefall.cdrom.com>
Sender: cvs-sys-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> After having typed in the full line
> 
> 	<wolf@dentaro.GUN.de> Wolfgang Stanglmeier
> 
> and for a few weeks now
> 
> 	<wolf@kintaro.cologne.de> Wolfgang Stanglmeier
> 
> tens of times for each file in the PCI and NCR sources, 
> I just got tired ...

Actually, this is still necessary.  If we want to programatically
determine who's responsible for a given change someday (perhaps
putting their name in an email response field) then we NEED to follow
the conventions already established.  This means a standard:

	"first last" <uname@host>

or
	first last <uname@host>

or

	uname [implied:  uname@freebsd.org]

as we established.  Ugen is right that this convention must be
followed religiously for it to have any true usefulness, and I'd like
to strongly encourage that all future commits (by anyone) not deviate
from these rules.

Thanks.

					Jordan