From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 04:12:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4B8106566B for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:12:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from glenbarber.us (onyx.glenbarber.us [199.48.134.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 117E28FC0A for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:12:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1541 invoked by uid 0); 14 Feb 2012 23:12:00 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO glenbarber.us) (76.124.49.145) by 0 with SMTP; 14 Feb 2012 23:12:00 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:11:58 -0500 From: Glen Barber To: Eitan Adler Message-ID: <20120215041158.GC1862@glenbarber.us> References: <20120215040311.GB1862@glenbarber.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120215040311.GB1862@glenbarber.us> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CfR: config chapter changes X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:12:01 -0000 On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:03:11PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote: > > @@ -547,11 +548,8 @@ > > day of the week. All these fields must be numeric values, and follow > > the twenty-four hour clock. The who field is special, > > and only exists in the /etc/crontab file. > > - This field specifies which user the command should be run as. > > - When a user installs his or her crontab file, they > > - will not have this option. Finally, the command > > option is listed. > >> - This is the last field, so naturally it should designate the command > > - to be executed. > > + This field specifies which user the command should be run > > + as. The last field is the command to be executed. > > Grammar nit: What do you think about "This field specifies the user > root under which the command should run." ? > Wording issue on my part. What I meant was: "This field specifies the user under which root should invoke the command." Glen