From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jan 16 01:06:09 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id BAA11588 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 16 Jan 1997 01:06:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from whale.gu.kiev.ua (whale.gu.net [194.93.190.4]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id BAA11581 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 1997 01:06:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from trifork.gu.net (trifork.gu.net [194.93.190.194]) by whale.gu.kiev.ua (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA74626; Thu, 16 Jan 1997 11:05:48 +0200 Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 11:05:54 +0200 (EET) From: Andrew Stesin To: Brian Somers cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD as an ISDN Router In-Reply-To: <199701160031.AAA15181@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Dear Brian, On Thu, 16 Jan 1997, Brian Somers wrote: > The alias stuff converts *every* port number for a given interface, making > what appears to be going on and what's actually going on into two completely > different things. Would you mind explaining me please, how the stuff discussed here differs from what IPfilter (with NAT "range-to-range" functionality) (see http://coombs.anu.edu.au/~avalon for details) does? thanks! Best regards, Andrew Stesin nic-hdl: ST73-RIPE