From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec 14 14:38:56 2010
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
	id BC05B1065697; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:38:56 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:38:56 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com>
Message-ID: <20101214143856.GA19947@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201012140611.oBE6B42j028412@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20101214072748.GA70334@FreeBSD.org>
	<4D07262A.3020303@aldan.algebra.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4D07262A.3020303@aldan.algebra.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports GIDs UIDs ports/net Makefile
	ports/net/minidlna Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist
	ports/net/minidlna/files BSDmakefile config.h getifaddr.c
	minidlna.sh.in patch-2928850 patch-aa patch-ab patch-inline
	patch-minidlna.c patch-upnphttp ...
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree
	<cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:38:56 -0000

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 03:09:14AM -0500, Mikhail T. wrote:
> On 14.12.2010 02:27, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> Why is dougb@ to be burdened reviewing these particular things?

Because Doug know this shit, and wants others' scripts to be nice and
dainty.  Judging by your commit, you know less then him.  I also know
less.  That's why I ask him to review every rc script I intend to commit.

> Having done the actual heavy-lifting of porting this Linux-only piece of 
> software back in June, I published the port's shar and asked -- on 
> ports@ -- for somebody else to contribute the start-up script. For 6 
> months no one has and now, finally, got around to learning, how to do 
> this myself.

Sorry that you've received no help on ports@.  But I have an advice:
read cvs-ports@ instead.  Then you'll see that dougb@ had been patiently
and calmly reviewing huge number of rc scripts, telling how can they be
improved.  Personally, I find cvs-ports@ a lot more valuable than ports@.

> >>   1.1       +11 -0     ports/net/minidlna/files/patch-aa (new)
> >>   1.1       +9 -0      ports/net/minidlna/files/patch-ab (new)
> >Apart from number of style bugs in the Makefile, can you explain why did
> Portlint's only complaint is the single MASTER_SITE... Feel free to 
> submit patches.

I will.  In the mean time, fuck portlint(1).  Think for yourself.

> >you go with `patch-xy' files, which is against current naming policy?
> Because I felt like this color was matching this bike shed the best... 
> Because several naming styles exist currently and this particular one 
> reminds the audience of the good old times, [...]

Please reread the PH.  You are clearly very wrong here.

./danfe