Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 29 Jun 2012 14:20:23 -0700
From:      Oleg Moskalenko <oleg.moskalenko@citrix.com>
To:        'Doug Barton' <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   RE: [HEADS-UP] BSD sort is the default sort in -CURRENT
Message-ID:  <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A3012CA28AEB8F@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net>
In-Reply-To: <4FEE17E1.90304@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <4FEAA280.2070705@FreeBSD.org> <4FEAA599.9070107@FreeBSD.org> <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A3012CA28AEB6D@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <4FEAC5B1.30104@FreeBSD.org> <4FEB6D2B.4090508@FreeBSD.org> <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A3012CA28AEB84@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A3012CA28AEB8E@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <4FEE17E1.90304@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug,

--nthreads option corresponds to --parallel option of NGNU=20
and it will be renamed. The other four proprietary options=20
will be marked as non-portable in the man page.=20

After nthreads=3D=3D>parallel renaming, NBSD will support all=20
NGNU options.

Thank you for the suggestion.
Oleg

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doug Barton [mailto:dougb@FreeBSD.org]
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 2:02 PM
> To: Oleg Moskalenko
> Cc: FreeBSD Current
> Subject: Re: [HEADS-UP] BSD sort is the default sort in -CURRENT
>=20
> On 06/29/2012 01:50 PM, Oleg Moskalenko wrote:
> > 5) NBSD adds several of its own new proprietary options:
> >
> >   --mergesort
> >   --qsort
> >   --heapsort
> >   --radixsort
> >   --nthreads=3D... (multi-threaded build only)
>=20
> Oleg,
>=20
> First, thank you very much for providing both the performance numbers,
> and the breakdown in the differences in command line options.
> Everything
> looks great, my only concern is the above.
>=20
> Are there similar/identical options in NGNU that correspond to the
> options above? If so, I would be hesitant to add new names for them
> because it hurts portability between platforms. If these are totally
> new
> features then my assumption is that you have clearly marked them as
> non-portable in the man page?
>=20
> Once again, I really appreciate you addressing my concerns, and your
> hard work on this project.
>=20
> Doug



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A3012CA28AEB8F>