From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Aug 7 18:37:43 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA13701 for chat-outgoing; Thu, 7 Aug 1997 18:37:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hwcn.org (main.hwcn.org [199.212.94.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA13696 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 1997 18:37:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca (ac199@james.hwcn.org [199.212.94.66]) by hwcn.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id VAA21091; Thu, 7 Aug 1997 21:37:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (ac199@localhost) by james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca (8.8.6/8.8.6) with SMTP id VAA27167; Thu, 7 Aug 1997 21:38:06 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca: ac199 owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 7 Aug 1997 21:38:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Vanderhoek X-Sender: ac199@james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca Reply-To: hoek@hwcn.org To: Greg Lehey cc: William Wong , FreeBSD Chat Subject: Re: Status of USB, TX chipset, PIIX3, etc. In-Reply-To: <199708072352.JAA15985@freebie.lemis.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 8 Aug 1997, Greg Lehey wrote: > Isn't it comforting to see that even Big Blue wasn't able to continue > ruling the world? Maybe. If Microsoft was what followed IBM, then I shudder to think of what will follow Microsoft. Anyways... Even the popular press seems to be going after MS, now... On the Apple-MS announcement, today's paper went on to list previous companies that were squished after making dealing with MS. -- Outnumbered? Maybe. Outspoken? Never! tIM...HOEk