From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 1 19:11:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1749837B401 for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2003 19:11:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vectors.cx (manifold.vectors.cx [66.180.241.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F11343F3F for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2003 19:11:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from monkey@vectors.cx) Received: from vectors.cx (b68b61251b107d9af1a417f3545bc188@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vectors.cx (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h522CLs9037106; Sun, 1 Jun 2003 19:12:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from monkey@vectors.cx) Received: (from monkey@localhost) by vectors.cx (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h522CKM4037105; Sun, 1 Jun 2003 19:12:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 19:12:20 -0700 From: Adam Weinberger To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030602021220.GG222@vectors.cx> Mail-Followup-To: Adam Weinberger , ports@freebsd.org, Hendrik Scholz Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Disposition: inline X-Editor: Vim 6.1 http://www.vim.org X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5 http://www.mutt.org X-PGP-Key: http://www.vectors.cx/pgp.key.txt X-URL: http://www.vectors.cx User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: Hendrik Scholz Subject: fluxbox-devel's install dir X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 02:11:47 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 So a PR has been submitted -- and a repocopy approved -- for the creation of x11-wm/fluxbox-devel. My question here is: should the port install over fluxbox, or into a separate directory? It's very easy to make the -devel port tack "-devel" onto the end of binary names and onto the sharedir dirname, and it works flawlessly in that regard. Should the port install into a separate directory, with unique binary names? Or is it OK for it to use the same (familiar) filenames as in the x11-wm/fluxbox port? I haven't heard back from the submitter since the PR was submitted. More info at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/52542 # Adam - -- Adam Weinberger vectors.cx >> adam@vectors.cx FreeBSD.org << adamw@FreeBSD.ORG #vim:set ts=8: 8-char tabs prevent tooth decay. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+2rKEo8KM2ULHQ/0RAp76AJ9AhCwD00Orkpweac8ejTFu9WzKMACgvSP9 R8EU+MGoXmpYw9BlCy/ALH4= =gao+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----