From owner-freebsd-scsi Thu Jun 18 17:03:13 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA11978 for freebsd-scsi-outgoing; Thu, 18 Jun 1998 17:03:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from roma.coe.ufrj.br (jonny@roma.coe.ufrj.br [146.164.53.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA11970 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 1998 17:03:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jonny@jonny.eng.br) Received: (from jonny@localhost) by roma.coe.ufrj.br (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA15043; Thu, 18 Jun 1998 21:02:45 -0300 (EST) (envelope-from jonny) From: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis Message-Id: <199806190002.VAA15043@roma.coe.ufrj.br> Subject: Re: Rolling CAM in, what is still needed? In-Reply-To: <199806182045.OAA08675@panzer.plutotech.com> from "Kenneth D. Merry" at "Jun 18, 98 02:45:23 pm" To: ken@plutotech.com (Kenneth D. Merry) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 21:02:45 -0300 (EST) Cc: ckempf@enigami.com, freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org #define quoting(Kenneth D. Merry) // One other area that could use some work/help is userland // application porting. So far, we have: Isn't it possible to do a compatibility layer in CAM ? Changes in API are always a PITA. Jonny -- Joao Carlos Mendes Luis M.Sc. Student jonny@jonny.eng.br Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message