From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 11 10:45:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F9B16A4CE for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:45:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (f170.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8555C43D45 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:44:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1BAiuLC009877; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:44:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: "Loren M. Lang" From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 11 Feb 2005 02:23:23 PST." <20050211102323.GA4287@alzatex.com> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:44:56 +0100 Message-ID: <9876.1108118696@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NetBSD and OpenBSD label geoms. X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:45:00 -0000 In message <20050211102323.GA4287@alzatex.com>, "Loren M. Lang" writes: >I have a quad-boot system with Gentoo Linux, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, and >NetBSD. I was disappointed to see that none of the BSD's can see each >other. (Linux could read at least 2 if not all of them.) So, I'd like >to rectify that by making FreeBSD be able to read the NetBSD disklabel >and then OpenBSD's disklabel. I'm thinking it will be easiest to copy >the FreeBSD disklabel geom and modify it to work with NetBSD, and then >merge it back into the FreeBSD disklabel code if it's still very >similar. I belive all you need to do is to increase MAXPARTITIONS. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.