From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jan 21 14:28:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4938037B402 for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2001 14:28:35 -0800 (PST) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA67700; Sun, 21 Jan 2001 23:28:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: "Giovanni P. Tirloni" Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Securelevel idea References: From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 21 Jan 2001 23:28:26 +0100 In-Reply-To: "Giovanni P. Tirloni"'s message of "Sun, 21 Jan 2001 17:52:29 -0200 (BRST)" Message-ID: Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Giovanni P. Tirloni" writes: > I was thinking about securelevels this afternoon and my brain came up > with an idea: what about if we could set fine-grained securelevels? Like, > each securelevel could have its own set of prohibitons and that could > only be changed setting some option in the kernel and compiling a new > one. Congratulations, you just invented capabilities! :) http://www.trustedbsd.org/ DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message