From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Dec  1 19:14:40 1995
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id TAA14915
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 1 Dec 1995 19:14:40 -0800
Received: (from dyson@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id TAA14907
          ; Fri, 1 Dec 1995 19:14:30 -0800
From: John Dyson <dyson>
Message-Id: <199512020314.TAA14907@freefall.freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Help!!!!
To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert)
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 1995 19:14:29 -0800 (PST)
Cc: alexandr@louie.udel.edu, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199512020206.TAA03219@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Dec 1, 95 07:06:23 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 858       
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> Terry Lambert said:
> I don't think you can do anything for now.  Apparently some patches for
> async mounts adversely affected non-async mounts.
> 
Please Terry, if you review the code changes for the Async operation,
and apparently you did not -- you will find that they are totally
benign (for sync mounts) -- in fact they are not fully implemented yet.  I
respectfully request that you review the target of your criticism.  The
problem lies elsewhere and it is still being researched.  I apologise
in advance for the tone of my statements, but time is/has been wasted
by assertions as above that have not been carefully reviewed.

If you are astute enough to confidently make the above statement, then
I suggest that a solution would be just as easy....  At least, as soon
as I have an analysis -- I usually have a solution...

John
dyson@freebsd.org