From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 29 18:24:14 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7C56B3;
 Tue, 29 Jan 2013 18:24:14 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au)
Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7074BEB5;
 Tue, 29 Jan 2013 18:24:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r0TIO4Dw094762;
 Wed, 30 Jan 2013 05:24:05 +1100 (EST)
 (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 05:24:04 +1100 (EST)
From: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>
To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
Subject: Re: what is required to support a new laptop?
In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgmuvv+8wOgju6bbjLk-WysDo8BpDaKebMMOd0aSohPO=w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20130130050811.H87033@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
References: <CAF6rxg=c=JN=N7NkWYdRHbgAqQTPGoFr=uLuXgiCfh+Ddd-C4w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130128114938.GK50515@e-new.0x20.net>
 <CAF6rxgnHayanFrLhmixdixe_pKeifPZG2mUYnJc51ioc47oYJQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAN6yY1tLY_LSv6xpcfD_oC_6769BSuFutKYE4+ExN81oyue5vQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130130024649.R87033@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
 <CAF6rxgnuC+9-TZV_3uv2hyGiGOngost9k2ct0ZFtfvnzeDPvEA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130130032714.D87033@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
 <CAF6rxgmuvv+8wOgju6bbjLk-WysDo8BpDaKebMMOd0aSohPO=w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, bapt@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: ACPI and power management development <freebsd-acpi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-acpi>,
 <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-acpi>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
 <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 18:24:14 -0000

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 12:46:43 -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
 > On 29 January 2013 12:29, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> wrote:
 > > Ah right.  I don't suppose kldload -v shows anything useful about the
 > > problem loading it?  Ah, never mind, it may be obvious .. lightly
 > > skimming your asl.y530.gz, I recalled folks having to patch something
 > > for Lenovo rather than IBM OEMIDs .. hunt, hunt .. ok, here it is:
 > >
 > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/164538
 > 
 > 
 > This is after the install of a patched acpi_ibm
 > [3500 root@gravity /usr/src/sys/modules/acpi ]#kldload -v acpi_ibm
 > Loaded acpi_ibm, id=12

Which looks maybe successful, on the face of it? ..

 > [5507 eitan@gravity (100)% ~ !1!]%sysctl dev.acpi_ibm
 > sysctl: unknown oid 'dev.acpi_ibm'

.. but clearly wasn't.

 > > Hopefully adding the LEN0068 to ibm_ids might allow acpi_ibm to load; if
 > > not more digging may be needed for this model.
 > 
 > I'm not sure what ID this is matching so I don't even know what to
 > look at to try a different one.

Me neither.  My Thinkpad T23 ASL shows this ID at:

                    Device (HKEY)
                    {
                        Name (_HID, EisaId ("IBM0068"))
                        Method (_STA, 0, NotSerialized)
                        {
                            Return (0x0F)
                        }

but I see no obvious corresponding device or other reference in yours.

 > >  > I mentioned this was a Lenovo IdeaPad Y530
 > >
 > > I'm assuming running 9.x?  I didn't see uname output in this thread.
 > 
 > [5505 eitan@gravity (100)% ~ ]%uname -a
 > FreeBSD gravity 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #3 r244942M: Wed Jan
 > 2 08:00:02 EST 2013     root@gravity:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
 > amd64
 > 
 > The "M" is a patched AR8161 driver and now a patched acpi_ibm driver.

Sorry, that was my one shot; now I'm out of my depth (and off to sleep)

[ Baptiste, fair enough that patch not making it into 9.1 .. and it 
seems there's more to getting this particular model going anyway. ]

cheers, Ian