From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 13 01:19:39 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4415E67A for ; Mon, 13 May 2013 01:19:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coco@executive-computing.de) Received: from mail.moehre.org (mail.moehre.org [195.96.35.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09F9C9DD for ; Mon, 13 May 2013 01:19:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.moehre.org (unknown [195.96.35.7]) by mail.moehre.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C23468B143B; Mon, 13 May 2013 03:19:31 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.963 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.963 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, AWL=0.037, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mail.moehre.org ([195.96.35.7]) by mail.moehre.org (mail.moehre.org [195.96.35.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iT7AE+w64CMS; Mon, 13 May 2013 03:19:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from probsd.c0c0.intra (p54B09AD7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.176.154.215]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: coco@executive-computing.de) by mail.moehre.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B008A8B1420; Mon, 13 May 2013 03:19:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 03:19:26 +0200 (CEST) From: Marco Steinbach X-X-Sender: coco@probsd.c0c0.intra To: grillo Subject: Re: compatibility SCO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 01:19:39 -0000 On Thu, 9 May 2013, grillo wrote: > I need use Microsoft Cobol Compiler and runtime developed for Xenix/Unix > system V SCO using NETBSD or FreeBSD, it is possible? have binary > compatibility ? environment compatibility ? > thank you You're probably forced to stay with MS Cobol for reasons beyond your control -- try and have a look at devel/open-cobol, nonetheless. Worked quite painlessly for getting run-off-the-mill code away from RM/Cobol about a year or two ago. MfG CoCo