From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 24 11:03:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8CBE16A401; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:03:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A082A43D4C; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:03:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 265B646BA7; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 06:03:26 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:03:26 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <200603232258.k2NMwgRN018180@repoman.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20060324110251.U75728@fledge.watson.org> References: <200603232258.k2NMwgRN018180@repoman.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/nfsclient nfs_socket.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:03:27 -0000 On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Fix a bug in the NFS/TCP retransmission path. > > The bug was that earlier, if a request was retransmitted, > we would do subsequent retransmits every 10 msecs. > > This can cause data corruption under moderate loads by reordering > operations as seen by the client NFS attribute cache, and on the > server side when the retransmission occurs after the original request > has left the duplicate cache, since the operation will be committed > for a second time. > > Further work on retransmission handling is needed (e.g. they are still > being done sent too often since they are scaled by HZ, and the size of > the dup cache is too small and easily overwhelmed on busy servers). Wow. Nice catch. Robert N M Watson