From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 22:02:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DADD916A41A for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:02:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from angel.ticketswitch.com (angel.ticketswitch.com [IPv6:2002:57e0:1d4e::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9516413C448 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:02:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from [10.50.50.2] (helo=smaug.rattatosk) by angel.ticketswitch.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JFzIC-000Gft-Up; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:02:28 +0000 Received: from dilbert.rattatosk ([10.50.50.6] helo=dilbert.ticketswitch.com) by smaug.rattatosk with esmtp (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JFzIC-000GcQ-Sl; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:02:28 +0000 Received: from petefrench by dilbert.ticketswitch.com with local (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JFzIC-0002KT-Qf; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:02:28 +0000 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, killing@multiplay.co.uk In-Reply-To: <014401c85a16$a5557280$b6db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:02:28 +0000 Cc: Subject: Re: To 6.3 or to 7.0 that is the question? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:02:29 -0000 > I know 7 has had a lot of work done on locking and ULE but are there > any other reasons to go for that instead of 6.3? Conversely are there > any reason which would point away from 7 such as stability issues? 7 is great - very stable, fast, includes ZFS, has gcc 4.0 and is excellent in my opinion. I have moved all our production systems to the pre-release using ULE (after thorough testing) and havent regretted it once. -pete.