From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat May 18 00:11:39 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id AAA03209 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 18 May 1996 00:11:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from caipfs.rutgers.edu (root@caipfs.rutgers.edu [128.6.155.100]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id AAA03202 for ; Sat, 18 May 1996 00:11:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from huahaga.rutgers.edu (huahaga.rutgers.edu [128.6.155.53]) by caipfs.rutgers.edu (8.6.9+bestmx+oldruq+newsunq+grosshack/8.6.9) with ESMTP id DAA14551; Sat, 18 May 1996 03:11:25 -0400 Received: (davem@localhost) by huahaga.rutgers.edu (8.6.9+bestmx+oldruq+newsunq+grosshack/8.6.9) id DAA04560; Sat, 18 May 1996 03:11:24 -0400 Date: Sat, 18 May 1996 03:11:24 -0400 Message-Id: <199605180711.DAA04560@huahaga.rutgers.edu> From: "David S. Miller" To: nate@sri.MT.net CC: imp@village.org, msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, nate@sri.MT.net, hackers@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <199605180415.WAA00621@rocky.sri.MT.net> (message from Nate Williams on Fri, 17 May 1996 22:15:15 -0600) Subject: Re: Note from Usenet Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 22:15:15 -0600 From: Nate Williams Comments made for pre2.0.4 (who thought of that naming scheme?) says the the TCP bugs still exist. See my previous comments on this subject, but it sounds like they aren't planning on fixing the 'real bugs' until after 2.0 is released since they don't have the time to do it right, and they want to get 2.0 out the door. So, it's going to stay that way. Incorrect, Linus wanted 2.0 out the door before he went to give a talk at a conference. We didn't get some things done we wanted to, and he is gone for the conference, so as of now we are at pre2.0.5 and will continue to work towards 2.0 when he returns. This gives us the time we need to fix the TCP bugs. Later, David S. Miller davem@caip.rutgers.edu