From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 29 17:50:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C53D16A41C; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:50:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dom@goodforbusiness.co.uk) Received: from mail.helenmarks.co.uk (mail.helenmarks.co.uk [82.68.196.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE12743D5C; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:50:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dom@goodforbusiness.co.uk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.helenmarks.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481C4222403; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:50:12 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.helenmarks.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.helenmarks.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 99626-02; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:50:09 +0100 (BST) Received: from egg.helenmarks.co.uk (egg.helenmarks.co.uk [192.168.15.3]) by mail.helenmarks.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722AD222402; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:50:09 +0100 (BST) From: Dominic Marks Organization: GoodforBusiness.co.uk To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:52:12 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200506291642.50119.dom@goodforbusiness.co.uk> <20050629171400.GA46153@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050629171400.GA46153@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="cp 850" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506291852.12798.dom@goodforbusiness.co.uk> X-Virus-Scanned: By ClamAV 0.85.1 Cc: pjd@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: graid3 + rsync + 5.4-STABLE repeatable panic (Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:50:21 -0000 On Wednesday 29 June 2005 18:14, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 04:42:49PM +0100, Dominic Marks wrote: > > This may be because I compiled my debugging kernel after I had > > installed the system, although it should have been an identical > > source tree ... I'm currently rebuilding the system to > > the freshest available -STABLE in the hope that may give a > > full backtrace. > > Yes, you can have this kind of problem if you compile a kernel.debug > "after the fact" and it doesn't quite match. Good to know, thank you. I've just built a fresh -stable system, so I will attempt to get the panic again with some useful information this time. > Kris Cheers, -- Dominic GoodforBusiness.co.uk I.T. Services for SMEs in the UK.