Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 19:42:02 -0800 From: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Anthony Jenkins <Anthony.B.Jenkins@att.net>, Mohammad Najafi <zapture@gmail.com>, "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" <freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Fwd: Activating Suspend/Resume on FreeBSD 10.1 Message-ID: <CAN6yY1t5=oUXn=mZs0CLUgZsou1NfjNN-AiNSoXx6fGpsCmucQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201502171040.35416.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <CAJ42Rm1dcpnUsD_-cdB3upUjNm=Jw%2B1j9WOEmH_7vN5zA7zDfA@mail.gmail.com> <54CA9529.1060903@att.net> <CAN6yY1sOwmQby8dOx6qkQCXKekcWbdWBO%2BhgmKBrXNw2tx1tMQ@mail.gmail.com> <201502171040.35416.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 7:40 AM, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Friday, January 30, 2015 12:37:10 pm Kevin Oberman wrote: > > My experience is the opposite. With KMS I could run with VESA and > without > > it I needed to pull VESA from my kernel. > > > > As of today I am running fine with KMS, i915, and vt(4) with a standard > > GENERIC 10-STABLE kernel. I was running KMS and vt(4) well before they > were > > MFCed, so I don't remember when I stopped adding "nooptions VESA", but I > > definitely used to need it to make suspect/resume work and don't any > longer. > > > > In any case, trying kernel without VESA is a good idea. > > FYI, VESA only applies to sc(4). It is ignored for vt(4). That is why it > "works" with vt(4). > > -- > John Baldwin > I suspected that was the case, but did not recall for sure. Thanks for the confirmation, though it does not help with the problem reported. -- Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAN6yY1t5=oUXn=mZs0CLUgZsou1NfjNN-AiNSoXx6fGpsCmucQ>