From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 13 23:01:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B25BA1065674 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:01:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lobo@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75BCB8FC1C for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:01:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywp6 with SMTP id 6so1762ywp.13 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:01:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.109.168 with SMTP id s28mr9610072yhg.74.1292281304620; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:01:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from papi.localnet ([187.78.171.174]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm4302451yhl.27.2010.12.13.15.01.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:01:43 -0800 (PST) From: Mario Lobo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:57:33 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-STABLE; KDE/4.5.2; amd64; ; ) X-KMail-Markup: true MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201012131957.33109.lobo@bsd.com.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Chinese FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:01:45 -0000 Hi; I know this is old news. http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=1682 I was just curious if anybody would have a clue on how they've hardened FBSD, either by just using its own resources or by hacking the code further. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99% winblows FREE)