Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 20:02:32 +0000 From: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> To: Navdeep Parhar <nparhar@gmail.com> Cc: Test Rat <ttsestt@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: awk(1) segfaults when building kernel modules Message-ID: <20110810200232.GA38421@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <CAPFoGT_EVNL5On9UYWwd%2Bvx5z4=8YYg%2BJjto6q2A9t89vrNqfg@mail.gmail.com> References: <86obzxw2ys.fsf@gmail.com> <CAPFoGT_EVNL5On9UYWwd%2Bvx5z4=8YYg%2BJjto6q2A9t89vrNqfg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed Aug 10 11, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Test Rat <ttsestt@gmail.com> wrote: > > `make -s buildkernel' seems to contain lots of segfaults after recent > > update of one-true-awk in r224731. It chokes on sys/conf/kmod_syms.awk. just out of curiosity: what's the point of doing a vendor import during a beta phase? isn't this exactly the kind of stuff you DON'T want to do, because it can only turn out badly? imho r224731 should completely be reverted. aren't those exactly the kind of commits re@ shouldn't approve? cheers. alex > ... > > > > Anyone else? > > I see this too.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110810200232.GA38421>