From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 1 13:39:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C897F16A54C; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 13:39:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gw.celabo.org (gw.celabo.org [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD3243D5F; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 13:39:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nectar@FreeBSD.org) Received: from lum.celabo.org (lum.celabo.org [10.0.1.107]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "lum.celabo.org", Issuer "celabo.org CA" (verified OK)) by gw.celabo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B03B3E2F0C; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 07:39:32 -0600 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lum.celabo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B90A260C731; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 07:39:29 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <42247091.9000701@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 07:39:29 -0600 From: Jacques Vidrine Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041206 Thunderbird/1.0 Mnenhy/0.7.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Moore References: <200502191157.06108.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> <200502281656.03547.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> <42231E8F.3020003@FreeBSD.org> <200503011707.13998.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200503011707.13998.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Alexander Leidinger cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org cc: security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux-tiff port update X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 13:39:33 -0000 On 3/1/05 12:37 AM, Ian Moore wrote: > Well I've just updated portaudit's database and one of the warnings has gone, > but not the other: [...] > Affected package: linux-tiff-3.6.1_1 > Type of problem: tiff -- tiffdump integer overflow vulnerability. What is my problem!? I guess these version number are so similar that the eye misreads them. At least my eye does. Damn my eyes! (^_~) Fixed. Cheers, -- Jacques A Vidrine / NTT/Verio nectar@celabo.org / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org