Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:30:31 -0500
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To:        Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Ryan Stone <rstone@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r230984 - head/sys/kern
Message-ID:  <201202060930.31511.jhb@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAF-QHFXQXqFskmMU%2BYxqmFEVKOoiHGMdnHBkSjqaEVZmjs_ovQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201202041649.q14GnUnI043572@svn.freebsd.org> <CAF-QHFXQXqFskmMU%2BYxqmFEVKOoiHGMdnHBkSjqaEVZmjs_ovQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday, February 06, 2012 6:34:06 am Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 4 February 2012 17:49, Ryan Stone <rstone@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > Author: rstone
> > Date: Sat Feb  4 16:49:29 2012
> > New Revision: 230984
> > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/230984
> >
> > Log:
> >  Whenever a new kernel thread is spawned, explicitly clear any CPU affinity
> >  set on the new thread.  This prevents the thread from inadvertently
> >  inheriting affinity from a random sibling.
> 
> Shouldn't new threads inherit affinity from the threads which spawned them?

User threads still do, but kernel threads are a bit tricky since most of them
get created during boot when everything is running on the BSP, so the affinity
they would inherit is rather bogus.  Even post-boot many of the cases I can
think of when you would create kthreads (e.g. expanding a thread pool), you
don't really want to inherit affinity.

-- 
John Baldwin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201202060930.31511.jhb>